AITPO (ANTECEDENT, INPUT, TRANSACTION, PRODUCT, OUTCOMES): MIXED MODEL EVALUASI CIPP DAN COUNTENACE SEBAGAI PENDEKATAN EVALUASI PROGRAM KAMPUS MENGAJAR

Yoga  Budi Bhakti; Burhanuddin  Tola; Dinny Devi  Triana

doi:10.56806/jh.v3i1.61

Authors

YB. Bhakti Universitas Negeri Jakarta
B. Tola Universitas Negeri Jakarta
DD. Triana Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56806/jh.v3i1.61

Keywords:

Kampus Mengajar, MBKM, Evaluation Model, Evaluation Program

Abstract

English: Kampus Mengajar is a teaching assistance activity at the level of educational units and part of the Merdeka Campus Program. The purpose of the Kampus Mengajar program is for students to have competence and provide an off-campus learning experience. In addition to having a good purpose, the Kampus Mengajar Program saves many problems faced by colleges and schools. This research is a form of literary study to develop the AITPO evaluation model (Antecedent, Input, Trasaction, Product, Outcomes) which is a combination of CIPP and Countenance models. The combination of CIPP and Countenance evaluation models is considered as a complementary approach in the implementation of evaluation of the Kampus Mengajar Program. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that the mixed of the two models is projected to provide a thorough and in-depth evaluation of the implementation of the Kampus Mengajar program. With the evaluation of this AITPO model can also be obtained comprehensive recommendations and complement each other in the continuity of the program.

Bahasa: Kampus Mengajar merupakan kegiatan asistensi mengajar di tingkat satuan pendidikan serta bagian dari Program Kampus Merdeka. Tujuan program Kampus Mengajar agar mahasiswa memiliki kompetensi serta memberikan pengalaman belajar di luar kampus. Disamping memiliki tujuan yang baik, Program Kampus Mengajar menyimpan banyak masalah yang dihadapi oleh Perguruan Tinggi maupun Sekolah. Penelitian ini merupakan bentuk kajian literaktur untuk mengembangkan model evaluasi AITPO (Antecedent, Input, Trasaction, Product, Outcomes) yang merupakan gabungan antara model CIPP dan Countenance. Penggabungan model evaluasi CIPP dan Countenance dinilai sebagai pendekatan yang komplementer dalam pelaksanaan evaluasi terhadap Program Kampus Mengajar. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa penggabungan kedua model tersebut diproyeksikan dapat membeikan evaluasi secara menyeluruh dan mendalam tentang pelaksanaan program Kampus Mengajar. Dengan evaluasi model AITPO ini juga dapat didapatkan rekomendasi secara komprehensif dan saling melengkapi dalam kelangsungan program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustina, I. (2020). Efektivitas pembelajaran matematika secara daring di era pandemi covid-19 terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, June.

Anwar, R. N. (2021). Pelaksanaan Kampus Mengajar Angkatan 1 Program Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kewirausahaan, 9(1), 210-219.

Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189-206.

Baharuddin, M. R. (2021). Adaptasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (Fokus: Model MBKM Program Studi). Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 195-205.

Bedduside, N. (2020, October). INOVASI PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI PADA ERA MERDEKA BELAJAR. In Seminar Nasional Biologi (Vol. 1, No. 1).

Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science education, 85(5), 536-553.

Brinkerhoff, R. O., Brethower, D. M., Nowakowski, J., & Hluchyj, T. (Eds.). (2012). Program evaluation: A practitioner’s guide for trainers and educators (Vol. 2). Springer Science & Business Media.

Bukit, A. V., Bastari, A., & Putra, G. E. (2019). Evaluation of learning programs in Indonesian Naval Technology College with the context, input, process, and product (CIPP) model. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 14(20), 3823-3827.

Chen, H. T. (1996). A comprehensive typology for program evaluation. Evaluation practice, 17(2), 121-130.

Dalal, R. S., & Bonaccio, S. (2010). What types of advice do decision-makers prefer?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112(1), 11-23.

Divayana, D. G. H., Suyasa, P. W. A., & Widiartini, N. K. (2021). An innovative model as evaluation model for information technology-based learning at ICT vocational schools. Heliyon, 7(2), e06347.

Effendi, D., & Wahidy, A. (2019, July). Pemanfaatan Teknologi dalam Proses Pembelajaran Menuju Pembelajaran Abad 21. In PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PROGRAM PASCASARJANA UNIVERSITAS PGRI PALEMBANG.

Endri, E. (2020). Evaluation of overseas field study program at the Indonesia Defense University. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(10).

Finney, T. L. (2020). Confirmative Evaluation: New CIPP Evaluation Model. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 18(2), 30.

Frye, A. W., & Hemmer, P. A. (2012). Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67. Medical teacher, 34(5), e288-e299.

Hakan, K., & Seval, F. (2011). CIPP evaluation model scale: development, reliability and validity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 592-599.

Handyanto, S., & Hidayat, A. (2021, July). Problematika Kebijakan Pembelajaran Bauran di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 dalam Memenuhi Hak atas Pendidikan. In Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang (Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 107-126).

Harjanti, R., Supriyati, Y., & Rahayu, W. (2019). Evaluation of learning programs at elementary school level of “Sekolah Alam Indonesia (SAI)”: evaluative research using countenance stake’s model. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 125-132.

Jacobs, F. H. (2017). The five-tiered approach to evaluation: Context and implementation. In Evaluating family programs (pp. 37-68). Routledge.

Khotimah, N. R., Riswanto, R., & Udayati, U. (2021). PELAKSANAAN PROGRAM KAMPUS MENGAJAR DI SD NEGERI 014 PALEMBANG SUMATERA SELATAN. SINAR SANG SURYA: Jurnal Pusat Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(2), 195-204.

Komarasari, N., Dlis, F., & Utomo, E. (2019). Implementation of the Countenance Stake Model in Evaluating the Effectiveness of Text-Based Indonesian Learning in Junior High Schools.

Lepri, B., Oliver, N., Letouzé, E., Pentland, A., & Vinck, P. (2018). Fair, transparent, and accountable algorithmic decision-making processes. Philosophy & Technology, 31(4), 611-627.

Ma’sum, M. (2020). Internal Quality Assurance Implementation Evaluation at the Engineering Faculty of Universitas Negeri Jakarta. KnE Social Sciences, 819-829.

Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu model evaluasi program pendidikan. At-Ta'dib, 6(1).

Mariati, M. (2021, August). Tantangan Pengembangan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka di Perguruan Tinggi. In Seminar Nasional Teknologi Edukasi Sosial dan Humaniora (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 749-761).

Menix, K. D. (2007). Evaluation of learning and program effectiveness. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 38(5), 201-208.

Mizikaci, F. (2006). A systems approach to program evaluation model for quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education.

Muryadi, A. D. (2017). Model evaluasi program dalam penelitian evaluasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Penjas (Penelitian, Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran), 3(1).

Nevo, D. (1983). The conceptualization of educational evaluation: An analytical review of the literature. Review of educational research, 53(1), 117-128.

Nurhasanah, A. D., & Nopianti, H. (2021, September). Peran Mahasiswa Program Kampus Mengajar Dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi SDN 48 Bengkulu Tengah. In SNPKM: Seminar Nasional Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (Vol. 3, pp. 166-173).

Pujiono, B., Santoso, T., Triyogo, Y. B., Ansari, I., Novianto, W., Hudha, T., ... & Sandi, P. (2020). Program Studi Menerapkan Kerja Sama Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar–Kampus Merdeka: PERANCANGAN KERJASAMA DAN KURIKULUM MERDEKA BELAJAR-KAMPUS MERDEKA PROGRAM STUDI S-1 TEATER FSP ISI SURAKARTA.

Setiawan, R., & Komalasari, E. (2020). Membangun Efektifitas Pembelajaran Sosiologi di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. EDUSOCIUS; Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosiologi, 4(1), 1-13.

Sherly, S., Dharma, E., & Sihombing, H. B. (2021, August). Merdeka belajar: kajian literatur. In UrbanGreen Conference Proceeding Library (pp. 183-190).

Spaulding, D. T. (2013). Program evaluation in practice: Core concepts and examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

Stake, R. E. (1983). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. In Evaluation models (pp. 287-310). Springer, Dordrecht.

Stake, R. E. (2011). Program evaluation particularly responsive evaluation. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 7(15), 180-201.

Stufflebeam, D. (2001). Evaluation models. New directions for evaluation, 2001(89), 7-98.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1968). Evaluation as enlightenment for decision-making.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In Evaluation models (pp. 117-141). Springer, Dordrecht.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In Evaluation models (pp. 279-317). Springer, Dordrecht.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications (Vol. 50). John Wiley & Sons.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Publications.

Sudaryanto, S., Widayati, W., & Amalia, R. (2020). Konsep Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka dan Aplikasinya dalam Pendidikan Bahasa (dan Sastra) Indonesia. Kode: Jurnal Bahasa, 9(2).

Suryadi, D., & Kudwadi, B. (2010, November). Application of evaluation model countenance in the secondary education curriculum and vocational technology. In Proceedings of the 1st UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (Vol. 10, No. 11, pp. 197-202).

Susilawati, N. (2021). Merdeka Belajar dan Kampus Merdeka Dalam Pandangan Filsafat Pendidikan Humanisme. Jurnal Sikola: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 2(3), 203-219.

Tohir, M. (2020). Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka.

Van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. (2015). Integrating data-based decision making, assessment for learning and diagnostic testing in formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(3), 324-343.

Warju, W. (2016). Educational program evaluation using CIPP model. INVOTEC, 12(1).

Widiharti, W., Tola, B., & Supriyat, Y. (2019). Evaluation of principal partnership programs in the directorate of education management-The application of Kirkpartick and countenance stake evaluation model. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9A), 71-77.

Widiyono, A., Irfana, S., & Firdausia, K. (2021). Implementasi Merdeka Belajar Melalui Kampus Mengajar Perintis Di Sekolah Dasar. Metodik Didaktik: Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-Sd-An, 16(2).

Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. A. (2010). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users. Sage Publications.

Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57-84.